data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c595/7c595b6a1830b8c734714e9004b43904c24728a0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb5f5/fb5f5e201f3075ca71bd6cfc69338143e8ab8026" alt=""
Much more to read here.
I can't find anything in here about depriving young people of basic financial resources to support their education.
The South Australian Labor State Government Plans to Cut an estimated $170 million from Public School Budgets in the next three years to create an Efficiency Dividend. This will translate into less resources in the classroom, including support staff, computing resources, library resources, sport programmes and other valuable programmes. They should be spending more not less. Call, Email, Write, Protest, in any way you feel comfortable.
Greens MP Mark Parnell says it is unfair that South Australian politicians will get a pay rise of nearly 7 per cent.
Federal MPs have been awarded an increase of 6.7 per cent and Mr Parnell says that will automatically be passed on to state MPs from next month.
Mr Parnell says other public sector employees have to take industrial action to win pay rises.
"There's no decision to be made at a state level, it's an automatic increase, and that's not fair," he said.
"SA politicians will be getting 14 per cent over two years and that's what the nurses are having to take industrial action to get, 14 per cent over two years.
"All workers should have their salaries adjusted according to inflation but there is no justification for the politicians to go ahead in leaps and bounds far ahead of inflation and far ahead of other workers."
A State Government official says MPs' wages are determined by an independent tribunal, not by the Government.
Public schools are facing a further $73 million of budgeted education cuts over the next three years, despite the State Government scrapping its controversial workers' compensation levy.
The proposals, outlined in last year's State Budget and which "remain on the table", equate to each of the state's 600 preschools, primary and secondary schools potentially being more than $120,000 out of pocket until 2009-10.
As predicted in The Advertiser yesterday, the State Government removed the 1 per cent levy on schools to help pay for the Education Department's workers' compensation scheme, which would have reaped it $17 million over three years.
However, the education fraternity remained concerned about the impact of other department "savings" listed in the 2006-07 Budget.
Of most concern to schools are "efficiency dividends" paid to the department, which purport to raise $32.5 million over the next three years, $18 million for losing the benefit of earning interest on unspent funds, and a surplus teacher levy of $17 million.
The Government has also budgeted to save a further $6 million from energy and water-saving efficiencies.
The Australian Education Union has postponed today's planned one-hour teachers' strike. However, industrial action was "not off the table".
AEU state branch president Andrew Gohl said the union would meet with the Education Department in the coming weeks to discuss its remaining concerns and would report to its members on August 17 to determine if further strikes were required.
Premier Mike Rann, who admitted the Government "got it wrong" by introducing the workers' compensation levy, said services or programs in the Education Department would not be cut as a result of its removal.
Education Minister Jane Lomax-Smith, in Budget estimates committees yesterday, could not answer what the Government's new savings target was after the decision to drop the levy, saying only that the Government would strive to reduce WorkCover claims.
She maintained reform of how WorkCover applied to schools had to occur, but it was yet to be proven if savings could be made in that area.
POLLY HAYNES and AAP
June 27, 2007 02:20pm
TOMORROW'S teachers' strike has been called off after the State Government ditched plans for a workers' compensation levy, admitting "we got it wrong".
Australian Education Union (AEU) state president Andrew Gohl said today the Government's about-face was "a massive victory for the AEU."
"This is not, however, the end of the matter," he said.
"While the government has pledged to abandon its entire WorkCover strategy and promised not to seek to recoup the costs through other avenues, there remain significant budget measures that will impact on schools.
"We are seeking immediate negotiations and have set a deadline to have these issues resolved by August 17 or we will reserve our right to reinstate industrial action."
The one per cent levy would have cost schools on average about $50,000 a year for four years.
Teachers from 600 preschools, primary and secondary schools were planning to strike for one hour at the end of the school day tomorrow to protest against the cuts, which were announced in the 2006-2007 State Budget.
Premier Mike Rann announced this morning the levy had been part of Government plans to improve school resources, but after listening to the concerns of teachers and parents, the Government had decided against it.
"It is still our belief that the way in which workers' compensation is run in our schools needs urgent reform, but we admit that our attempt at a solution would unreasonably impact on school communities," Mr Rann said.
“"We made a mistake on this and we are reversing it so no school will have to feel the pain of this WorkCover levy, we have killed it stone dead. We've listened."
“We’re saying we got it wrong, we got it wrong.
""We make mistakes, we are just the same as you (journalists) ... sometimes people in their lives make mistakes."
Opposition leader Martin Hamilton-Smith said Mr Rann had again overruled Education Minister Jane Lomax-Smith, showing it was time she was dumped from Cabinet.
Ms Lomax-Smith told parliament just last week that the decision to impose a WorkCover levy on schools was a “savings target” that would be “re-directed into education,” Mr Hamilton-Smith said.
“She also claimed the levy was part of a massive reform agenda in education,” he said.
“Poor old Jane – she’s out their defending her way of running education and then the Premier jumps over her and says they got it wrong.
“It’s time for the Minister to shuffle off to the backbench.”
An open invitation to the Education Minister
THIS IS an invitation to Minister for Education and Children's Services, Jane Lomax-Smith.
On behalf of the Renmark Junior Primary School and Renmark Primary School Governing Council, I am writing to invite you to our next Governing Council meeting to be held at 58 Murtho Street, Renmark, on June 25, at 7pm.
We are inviting you to explain to the council, students, staff and the members of our wider school community that, to comply with the draconian financial impost you are forcing on our school, we will need to significantly reduce the quality of education we can provide to our students.
The Governing Council is fully aware of, and remains supportive of, the need for financial stringency, but it is clearly apparent, despite your statements to the contrary, that our school has been significantly disadvantaged financially since the introduction of Partnerships 21.
Our schools will need to cut our budgets by some $58,860 to comply with your edict and the only method our schools have available to achieve this impost, is to significantly:
- Cut the amount of SSO/student contact time within the primary school.
- Cut a school funded early intervention support program within the junior primary.
- Cut the furniture replacement program (most of which is over 15 years old).
- Cut the ongoing upgrade of computers and peripherals across both schools.
- Cut subsidizing excursions and external performances to all students.
- Cut the supply of resources to education programs.
- Cut access to the Life Education van.
All of the above are of vital importance in providing the support, equipment and programs the council believe are of prime necessity in assisting our students, at an important time of their life, to gain a solid grounding in the education they need to prepare for and become sound members of our community.
A wise person once said that 'a community will be judged by the education it provides its children'. If the above is the case, then we will not be judged well.
Should you not be able to attend our meeting or wish to discuss the matter further please contact me directly on 0428 100 253 or email at mcdonalds.renmark@bigpond.com.au
I wait with anticipation your acceptance to attend our meeting.
MARK A McDONALD
Chairperson of Renmark Junior Primary School and Renmark Primary School Governing Council
The Renmark Junior and Primary School, in south-eastern South Australia, says it
will have to cut student services if funding changes proposed in last year's
State Budget are implemented.
The changes include making schools pay a
WorkCover levy of 1 per cent on salary costs.
The school's governing council
chairman, Mark McDonald, has asked Education Minister Jane Lomax-Smith to attend
a meeting later this month, but is yet to get a reply.
Mr McDonald says the
school is unable to turn to the community to seek assistance for help.
"We
certainly wouldn't be able to fundraise within the community to cover those
costs, given that our community in Renmark like most country communities has
been significantly affected by drought," he said.
A spokesman for Ms
Lomax-Smith says the Minister has received the letter.
In a written
statement, Ms Lomax-Smith says the Education Department will continue to liaise
with schools about how the changes will be rolled out from the start of next
year.
"We're today sending a ballot out to all schools and preschools asking them to vote on stop work action for Thursday June 28. We've asked for the results to be returned by close of business on Monday."
"We are proposing a one hour stop work meeting from 2.30 until 3.30 pm. Our aim is to minimise inconvenience to parents while sending a strong message to the government that we're prepared to defend schools and defend our children's right to quality learning."
Treasurer Kevin Foley's blunt refusal to discuss public education funding with school communities has provoked an angry reaction and the likelihood of a state wide stop work next week.
AEU State President Andrew Gohl says Mr Foley is callously ignoring the concerns of teachers, principals and parents and appears hell bent on taxing our children and compromising their learning.
"Mr Foley claims his government is spending more on public education. Yet schools and preschools are to have 1% of their budgets cut - that's in the order of $50,000 to $100,000 for most schools," Mr Gohl says.
"Cuts of that magnitude mean one thing - an attack on kids' opportunity to learn. Schools will be forced to cut staff, cut programs or both. Preschools will be forced to choose between employing a teacher or employing an Early Childhood Worker, when the reality is they need both."
"Kevin Foley isn't even prepared to listen to our concerns. He is sacrificing our children's futures to fund a couple of razzle dazzle education projects. It is an outrage!" Mr Gohl says.
"Such is the level of dismay and disgust that we've been contacted by teachers and principals across the state wanting to take action. Accordingly, we've listened to their concerns - unlike the treasurer."
"We're today sending a ballot out to all schools and preschools asking them to vote on stop work action for Thursday June 28. We've asked for the results to be returned by close of business on Monday."
"We are proposing a one hour stop work meeting from 2.30 until 3.30 pm. Our aim is to minimise inconvenience to parents while sending a strong message to the government that we're prepared to defend schools and defend our children's right to quality learning."
"From the strong turnout of more than 4000 people at last week's rally at Parliament House, we know we have the strong backing of most parents. They don't want to see their children's futures jeopardised by a government prepared to put ledger sheets ahead of learning. We're confident they'll support our action and appreciate our efforts to minimise the impact on them" Mr Gohl says.
"This government intends to strip money, insultingly described as an "efficiency dividend" every year until at least 2010. This means a haemorrhaging of funds from programs for our kids and is a direct attack on their ability to learn. It is an absolute disgrace that the treasurer, and indeed the education minister, have flatly refused to meet the AEU or representatives from principal and parent organisations."
School principals who have spoken out against education budget cuts are being "chastised" by their superiors, effectively gagging them from making public statements.
The Advertiser yesterday telephoned 10 principals across the state about the budget cuts. Only two were willing to comment.
Seven principals did not wish to comment while one in the Mid North referred The Advertiser to the Education Department's regional district office.
SA Primary Principals Association president Glyn O'Brien said the State Government had pushed "very strongly" for principals not to comment in public on the issue.
"The people who have made comments have been somewhat chastised and been reminded in no uncertain terms that they are public servants," she said.
Ms O'Brien said there was an element of "fear" among principals about speaking out.
It was revealed this week nurses had been gagged from speaking to the media about their dispute with the State Government over pay and conditions.
Black Forest Primary School principal Phil Greaves said he had not officially been told to avoid speaking to the media about the Budget cuts but was aware some principals would be reluctant.
"I think you'll find a lot of principals would be outspoken about this topic because of the enormity of the issue," he said.
"In our budget, we'll have to make provisions for about $50,000 less, which translates to about $80 per child meaning we'll have to make cuts in key areas."
Dover Gardens Primary School principal John Grant said the "savings initiatives" listed by the Government in the 2006-07 State Budget were "going to have a significant effect".
"We're a small school with close to 80 students and if they take 1 per cent of our salaries for the WorkCover levy along with the other changes, it's going to have a big impact," he said.
Treasurer Kevin Foley defended the changes as the result of devolution policy instigated by the former Liberal government.
A spokeswoman for Education Minister Jane Lomax-Smith said "no directive about speaking to the media has been given by the Minister or her office to any principal or staff member."
Public schools will soon forcibly cut funding for major resources - ultimately disadvantaging students - in response to new taxes outlined in the 2006-07 State Budget.
Principals have warned the new taxes, which include a 1 per cent WorkCover levy on total staff salaries, mean they have the tough choice of either slashing funds for learning resources or increasing school fees.
The warning came as Premier Mike Rann denied Labor MPs were concerned about losing their seats because of the cuts.
One school has detailed to The Advertiser the direct impact of the cuts on their resources, which they estimate would total $50,000 from discretionary funds out of their annual budget.
The resource cuts - five lots of $10,000 in this school's case - would hit:
IT which would result in its network and hardware becoming outdated over time.
SPECIAL Education support program, disadvantaging those most in need.
STAFF training, reducing the knowledge and skills of its staff.
LIBRARY resourcing - which is most of its budget - resulting in out of date resources "very quickly" and $10,000 more, which "gives them nowhere else to cut from without impacting on staffing and class sizes".
The school's principal said: "We can either charge parents an extra $100 per child . . . or we can reduce resourcing."
SA Primary Principals Association president Glyn O'Brien said the cuts were "something Treasurer Kevin Foley doesn't understand".
"We want the opportunity to sit down and put in front of him the facts and figures but we've had no response at all to our pleas or letters asking for that," she said.
Mr Rann told Parliament yesterday that no Labor backbenchers, including former teacher Chloe Fox, had indicated to him they held concerns about their jobs.
His denial was met with howls of protest from the Liberals after speculation Ms Fox raised the issue in Caucus. Ms Fox yesterday refused to comment.
Next Thursday, teachers are expected to strike for one-hour to protest against the new taxes.
A spokeswoman for the Education Department said "all savings measures announced in last year's Budget will be redirected back into public education".
Louise Quinn, who has two children attending Reynella Primary School, is concerned about the impact of the new taxes.
"It will impact severely on an already limited school budget and there will be the financial impact on parents if the extra costs are passed on," she said.
Thousands of parents and teachers will rally across the state today in protest at cuts to public education funding.
They say the cuts from next year "will impact on every classroom in South Australia". Rallies will take place from 4.30pm on the steps of Parliament House in the city and in Mount Gambier, Berri, Port Pirie, Port Augusta, Port Lincoln and Whyalla.
They are responding to "savings initiatives" listed in the 2006-07 State Budget for the Department of Education and Children's Services. In total, an estimated $84 million in savings over four years will be borne by schools. That equates to nearly $500 for each of the state's 171,200 public education students.
Schools say the cost-shifting will result in them not being able to afford school support officers, computer upgrades and replacement, library books, special programs and key classroom resources.
Schools could be up to $100,000 out of pocket each year. A key concern is the proposal for schools to pay 1 per cent of their total staff salaries towards a WorkCover levy.
SA Primary Principals Association president Glyn O'Brien said the rally was an "unprecedented" move by schools to campaign against Budget cuts.
"When you talk about a figure such as $25 million it doesn't mean much to parents but when you narrow it down to what impact that is going to have on the school their children attend, it really hits home," she said. "We have only really found out in the past two months how these initiatives will be carried out and we were never consulted by the department. It was just a briefing with their options."
Secondary Principals Association Jim Daves said the Budget cuts would "impact on every classroom in the state".
"It will put the profession of teaching in a very difficult position over the forthcoming years," he said.
"Next year we'll survive with the computers we've got, the following year some will break down and we're not going to have the money to replace them.
"Our existing text books will survive another year, the year after we'll put sticky tape on them but there comes a time where we need to replace them with new ones. An Education Department spokeswoman said: "We want to assure families and staff that all efficiencies, as outlined in the 2006-07 State Budget, will be redirected back into public education in SA to deliver quality education for children".
Don’t Let These Three
Smiling Assassins Steal
From Your Children.
No Cuts to
Public
Schools in